Yan E. Yuril
|
LLC TyumenNIIgiprogaz |
Tyumen, Russian Federation yurilye@tngg.ru |
Sergey A. Leontiev
|
Ukhta State Technical University |
Ukhta, Russian Federation sleontev@ugtu.net |
Maxim S. Rogalev
|
LLC TyumenNIIgiprogaz |
Tyumen, Russian Federation rogalevms@tngg.ru |
In this paper we analyzed existing techniques for degassing volatile liquid hydrocarbons to determine the component-fractional composition. The aim of the study is to determine advantages and disadvantages of theexisting methods and possibilities of their practical use. A new scheme of degassing of unstable liquid hydrocarbons (ULH). The comparative results for the degassing of ULH under the new scheme and according to the standard. Reflect the issues of choice and add the working fluid and the selection of the method of degassing under fluid.
Materials and methods
According to the techniques described in STO Tumenniigiprogaz 02-04-2009 and R Gazprom 086-2010 carried out degassing ULH, and the comparison of the obtained results GF and component-fraction composition.
Results
The results show minor differences by different techniques, which is not critical for quality control of incoming raw materials and by-products. The analysis of the presented methods of degassing ULH gives you the opportunity to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each method and choose themost appropriate for the purposes of the study.
Сonclusions
Proposed new scheme and the method primarily allows you to automate the process and reduce the number of operations for degassing volatile liquid hydrocarbons, thus without any loss of quality to increase the number of ongoing degassing without much effort. The basis of the new method is the use of more modern means of measurement, their universality and accessibility.
volatile liquid hydrocarbons
degassing
kondensatoren
component-fractional composition
degassed condensate
gas de